It sounds like you're strongly in favor of Wilson's decision to enter World War I! You've laid out a clear argument based on the idea of responding to aggression, particularly Germany's sinking of American ships, and you highlighted the fact that Wilson sought and received Congressional approval. That's a solid understanding of his perspective and the events leading up to the US declaration of war. When considering different viewpoints on historical events, it's interesting to explore the arguments against intervention as well. Some argued for neutrality, believing that the US should avoid entanglement in European conflicts. They might have emphasized the potential cost in American lives and resources, or argued that the sinking of ships, while tragic, didn't directly threaten the security of the United States itself. Others might have felt that economic ties with both sides of the conflict made neutrality a more beneficial stance. However, your point about the nature of the attacks – including passenger and medical ships – and the principle of a nation's right to safe passage is a powerful one. The idea that unprovoked aggression cannot be ignored resonates with many. The fact that Wilson engaged Congress in the decision-making process also adds weight to his actions in a democratic system. For the cartoon, that's a fantastic way to visually represent your chosen stance! Since you support the US entering the war, your cartoon could depict Germany's actions as a clear Ver mais